Here's the thing about movie critic reviews: while they are not perfect, you can generally trust them. When they tell you to skip Sharknado, but that Guardians of the Galaxy was pretty good, they are usually right. There are of course exceptions to this rule—for example I thought Snowpiercer was the worse piece of garbage film I've ever set my eyes on in recent years, but it was almost universally lauded by critics.
But overall, you can trust them by and large.
But, and this cannot be overemphasized, this is only true for Western film critics.
When Indian film critics tell you a movie is good or bad, do not trust them.
Here's a fun exercise to prove my point: Go and find all the movie reviews you can on Slumdog Millionaire. Once you have done that, divide these into two categories, those done by Indian film critics, and everyone else. Take the Indian pile, and further divide it into two more piles, every review made before the film swept Oscars, and every review after. Now, read through the reviews.
Notice something interesting about them? Most of the Western reviews say something along the lines of, "This is a very good movie." At the time I saw it, shortly after it had come out, I agreed. I thought it was excellent and encouraged everyone I knew to watch it.
Indian reviews on the other hand, all panned the film. They all said the same thing: (1) it was a terrible story, and (2) it did not accurately represent India.
Now if you read the Indian reviews of the film after it won the Oscars, they all changed their tune, they all said that it was an excellent film and totally worthy of praise. Interestingly, these were written by those same reviewers who panned the film a few weeks/months earlier. Some of them had the honesty to say as much, and admitted they were not really objectively judging the film earlier, but most did not refer to their hypocrisy.
So what was the problem? I believe that Indain film critics, do not hold themselves to objective standards when they review films.
Their reviews are colored by the actors in the film, the amount of money it costs to make the film, etc. Very few reviewers actually review the film.
Which brings me to the topic of my current post. I decided to watch Mardaani based on Indian film critic reviews (my mistake). They all loved it and said was a lovely film.
It was not. The plot was completely unbelievable, the acting was fake, the characters were caricatures of cops and gangsters. And I, like a fool, kept waiting for it to get really good. Because I had read the reviews (from Indian critics).
It was, in short, a terrible movie. Skip it. And you can believe me when I say that.